Vitek v. Jones

445 U.S. 480, 100 S. Ct. 1254, 63 L. Ed. 2D 552 (1980)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Vitek v. Jones

United States Supreme Court
445 U.S. 480, 100 S. Ct. 1254, 63 L. Ed. 2D 552 (1980)

  • Written by Nicole Gray , JD
Play video

Facts

In 1974, Jones (defendant) was sentenced to three to nine years in a Nebraska prison for robbery. Six months into his prison sentence, Jones was placed in solitary confinement, where he set fire to his mattress and suffered severe burns. Jones was treated for his burns in a private hospital. After recovery, Jones was transferred to the security unit of a state mental hospital pursuant to Nebraska law, which authorized the transfer upon findings by a psychiatrist that Jones was mentally ill and could not receive adequate care at the prison. Jones challenged the transfer, arguing that transfers of mentally ill inmates to mental hospitals implicate liberty interests that require that he be afforded due-process protections. A state district court ruled in Jones’s favor, indicating that mentally ill inmates must be afforded minimal procedural protections, including being appointed legal counsel if indigent. Nebraska’s director of correctional services, Vitek (plaintiff), appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)

Concurrence (Powell, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership