Vivendi SA v. Deutsche Telecom

Case No. 4A_428/2008 (2009)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Vivendi SA v. Deutsche Telecom

Swiss Federal Supreme Court
Case No. 4A_428/2008 (2009)

Facts

Vivendi SA and other associated entities (plaintiffs) alleged that Deutsche Telecom and other associated entities, including the Polish company Elektrim SA (defendants), entered into a settlement agreement that contained an arbitration clause, compelling arbitration before the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) in Switzerland. The settlement agreement was never signed. Vivendi and the other plaintiffs initiated arbitration proceedings before the ICC. Deutsche Telecom and the other defendants challenged the ICC’s jurisdiction, but the arbitral tribunal determined that it had prima facie jurisdiction to arbitrate the matter, and the proceeding continued. [Ed's note: The basis for the initial challenge to jurisdiction is not noted in the opinion, but it is presumed to be the lack of signatures to the settlement agreement.] Thereafter, Elektrim notified the arbitral tribunal that the Warsaw bankruptcy court had declared Elektrim bankrupt. Under Polish law, a declaration of bankruptcy resulted in the automatic cancellation of any ongoing arbitration proceedings to which the bankrupt entity was a party. The arbitral tribunal applied Polish law to determine Elektrim’s capacity to participate as a party in the arbitration proceedings, and it stayed the arbitration proceedings as to Elektrim. Vivendi and the other plaintiffs appealed to Swiss federal court, arguing that the proceedings before a Swiss court or arbitral tribunal sitting in Switzerland should not be terminated on account of Polish law, and that the proceedings against Elektrim should therefore continue.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Klett, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership