Vivendi SA v. Deutsche Telecom
Swiss Federal Supreme Court
Case No. 4A_428/2008 (2009)

- Written by Whitney Waldenberg, JD
Facts
Vivendi SA and other associated entities (plaintiffs) alleged that Deutsche Telecom and other associated entities, including the Polish company Elektrim SA (defendants), entered into a settlement agreement that contained an arbitration clause, compelling arbitration before the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) in Switzerland. The settlement agreement was never signed. Vivendi and the other plaintiffs initiated arbitration proceedings before the ICC. Deutsche Telecom and the other defendants challenged the ICC’s jurisdiction, but the arbitral tribunal determined that it had prima facie jurisdiction to arbitrate the matter, and the proceeding continued. [Ed's note: The basis for the initial challenge to jurisdiction is not noted in the opinion, but it is presumed to be the lack of signatures to the settlement agreement.] Thereafter, Elektrim notified the arbitral tribunal that the Warsaw bankruptcy court had declared Elektrim bankrupt. Under Polish law, a declaration of bankruptcy resulted in the automatic cancellation of any ongoing arbitration proceedings to which the bankrupt entity was a party. The arbitral tribunal applied Polish law to determine Elektrim’s capacity to participate as a party in the arbitration proceedings, and it stayed the arbitration proceedings as to Elektrim. Vivendi and the other plaintiffs appealed to Swiss federal court, arguing that the proceedings before a Swiss court or arbitral tribunal sitting in Switzerland should not be terminated on account of Polish law, and that the proceedings against Elektrim should therefore continue.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Klett, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.