Voelkel v. Harrison

572 So. 2d 724 (1990)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Voelkel v. Harrison

Louisiana Court of Appeal
572 So. 2d 724 (1990)

Facts

In 1983, Martin A. Harrison, III (defendant) gave Lucille Scovotto Voelkel (plaintiff) a mortgage on certain property (the mortgaged property). The recorded mortgage agreement named the mortgagor as “Martin A. Harrison, III.” However, the title records named the owner of the mortgaged property as “Martin Harrison, III.” In December 1985, State Farm Acceptance Corporation of Louisiana, Inc. (State Farm) acquired an interest in the mortgaged property. Subsequently, Harrison defaulted on his mortgage agreement with Voelkel. Voelkel sued Harrison to foreclose on her mortgage. State Farm intervened to claim a priority interest in the mortgaged property. State Farm relied on an October 1985 case, which held that a mortgagee’s failure to match the mortgagor’s name in the recorded document to the owner’s name in the title records rendered the recorded document ineffective against subsequent mortgagees. Voelkel argued that the legislature implemented a remedial statute in 1987, which specifically provided that a mortgage interest will not lose priority for including, or failing to include, a mortgagor’s middle name or initial in the recorded document. The trial court refused to apply the 1987 statute retroactively and reasoned that doing so would interfere with State Farm’s vested right in its priority interest. Accordingly, the trial court ruled that State Farm’s interest had priority over Voelkel’s mortgage. Voelkel appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Becker, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership