Vogel v. Grant-Lafayette Electric Cooperative

548 N.W.2d 829 (1996)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Vogel v. Grant-Lafayette Electric Cooperative

Wisconsin Supreme Court
548 N.W.2d 829 (1996)

Play video

Facts

Dale and Alice Vogel (plaintiffs) were dairy farmers who received their electrical supply for their dairy from Grant-Lafayette Electric Cooperative (GLEC). In 1970, after the Vogels built a new milking facility, they noticed many cows in their herd started acting strange and suffered from diseases that reduced their milk production. The Vogels began suspecting the cows were being impacted by stray voltage from GLEC. After being contacted by the Vogels about the problem in 1986, GLEC responded to the issue of possible stray voltage by installing an “isolator” at its transformer on the Vogel farm. After this, the health and behavior of the Vogels’ herd dramatically improved. In 1992, the Vogels brought suit against GLEC on theories of negligence and nuisance for the “annoyance and inconvenience” caused by the stray voltage. At trial, the jury found GLEC was negligent and had created a nuisance. It awarded the Vogels $240,000 for negligence and $60,000 for annoyance and inconvenience based on nuisance. The jury also found the Vogels guilty of contributory negligence amounting to one-third of the fault. The trial judge entered a verdict awarding the Vogels $200,000, and both parties appealed. The appellate court held that GLEC had not created a private nuisance, and struck the trial court’s award of $60,000 for annoyance and inconvenience. The Vogels appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bradley, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 736,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 736,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 736,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership