Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
777 N.W.2d 915 (2009)
On February 18, 2007, Paul and Teresa Donovan (defendants) agreed to purchase a home from Terry and Vicki Vohs (plaintiffs). The agreement was contingent upon the Vohses’ ability to obtain a home of their choice by February 20, 2007. At the time, the Vohses’ had given a counteroffer to purchase another home. That counteroffer had to be accepted by February 19, 2007, and ultimately was accepted on that date. Although this acceptance was communicated to the Donovans, the Donovans failed to purchase the Vohses’ home. The Vohses brought a breach of contract claim against the Donovans. The Donovans’ moved for summary judgment on grounds that the contingency in the contract rendered the contract indefinite and illusory. The circuit court granted the Donovans summary judgment. The Vohses appealed, arguing that the contingency was both definite and not illusory.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Vergeront, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 202,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.