Voishan v. Palma

609 A.2d 319 (1992)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Voishan v. Palma

Maryland Court of Appeals
609 A.2d 319 (1992)

Play video

Facts

Margaret Voishan Palma (plaintiff) and John Voishan (defendant) were divorced in Maryland in 1981. Margaret and John had two daughters. Margaret was awarded custody of the children, and John was ordered to pay $250 per month in child-support payments. Four years later, that amount was increased to $1,400 per month. On March 8, 1991, Margaret filed a motion to modify child support because John’s income had increased to $145,000 per year. In determining child-support obligations, Maryland applies the income-shares model, which takes the income of both parents into account and requires that each parent pays his or her proportional share. Following a hearing, the judge found that John’s child-support obligation for his minor daughter should be increased from $700 per month to $1,550 per month. In making his decision, the judge reviewed the parties’ financial circumstances, considered the needs of the child, and then apportioned the reasonable expenses of the child. John appealed the decision.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Chasanow, J.)

Concurrence (McAuliffe, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 745,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership