Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Schlunk

486 U.S. 694 (1988)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Schlunk

United States Supreme Court
486 U.S. 694 (1988)

Play video

Facts

The parents of Herwig Schlunk (plaintiff) were killed in a car accident. Schlunk filed a wrongful-death action in Illinois state court against Volkswagen of America, Inc. (Volkswagen) alleging that Volkswagen had designed and sold the vehicle. After Volkswagen answered denying that it had designed or built the vehicle, Schlunk filed an amended complaint adding Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft (Volkswagenwerk) (defendant) as a defendant. Volkswagen was a wholly owned subsidiary of Volkswagenwerk, a German company based in Germany. Schlunk served the amended complaint on Volkswagen as Volkswagenwerk’s agent, in accordance with Illinois law, which permitted such substituted service on a foreign entity by serving its wholly owned domestic subsidiary. Volkswagenwerk entered a special appearance and moved to quash service, arguing that it could only be served in accordance with the Convention on Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil and Commercial Matters (the Hague Convention). The trial court denied the motion, holding that the Hague Convention did not apply because Volkswagenwerk had been properly served in the United States and did not need to be served abroad.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (O’Connor, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 816,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership