Volusia County v. Joynt
Florida Court of Appeals
179 So. 3d 448 (2015)
- Written by Salina Kennedy, JD
Facts
Erin Joynt (plaintiff) was sunbathing on a beach when she was run over by a truck owned by Volusia County (defendant) and sustained severe injuries. Prior to the incident, Joynt had worked as a reading-intervention paraeducator who provided specialized teaching assistance for middle- and high-school students. At the time of the incident, Joynt was voluntarily unemployed because she had chosen to stay at home with her young children until the youngest entered kindergarten. One year after the incident, Joynt returned to work, earning $18,000 per year plus benefits. Joynt sued Volusia County, asserting several claims including lost future earning capacity. At trial, Joynt’s principal testified that Joynt was effective at her job and that she would be rehired for the next school year. The principal further testified that she had no concerns about Joynt’s career progression, including her ability to be promoted, but that Joynt would be reevaluated if her health ever declined. Joynt argued that her earning capacity was diminished because her health could decline in the future, preventing her from remaining employed. A jury awarded Joynt $500,000 in damages for lost future earning capacity, and Volusia County appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Berger, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.