Von Bulow by Auersperg v. Von Bulow
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
811 F.2d 136 (1987)
- Written by Sara Adams, JD
Facts
Martha von Bulow’s two children (plaintiffs) filed a federal civil case on Martha’s behalf against her husband Claus von Bulow (defendant), alleging Claus caused Martha to fall into a coma by secretly injecting her with drugs. Andrea Reynolds was a close companion of Claus who attended his criminal trial for the attempted murder of Martha. Reynolds was subpoenaed to testify in the civil case and produce certain documents, including a manuscript for a book she was writing about the von Bulow family, investigative reports she ordered about the von Bulow children, and notes she took during Claus’s criminal trial. Reynolds admitted that the manuscript was based wholly on information in the public domain, her memories, and the investigative reports. The manuscript was written under contract with a publisher. Reynolds admitted that the investigative reports were commissioned solely to vindicate Claus. Reynolds initially characterized the trial notes as merely doodles, later argued that the notes were to be used for a newspaper article, and then ultimately admitted that she continued to take notes after negotiations with the newspaper fell through. Reynolds claimed that the journalist’s privilege protected her against the forced production of the investigative reports, the trial notes, and the book manuscript. The district court found that all the material was discoverable and rejected Reynolds’ privilege claim. Reynolds appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Timbers, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.