Voss v. Commissioner
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
796 F.3d 1051 (2015)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Bruce Voss and Charles Sophy (plaintiffs) were not married but owned a house together. For their 2006 and 2007 tax returns, Voss and Sophy each claimed a mortgage interest deduction under section 163(h)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Section 163(h)(3) placed a $1.1 million limit on the amount of home-related debt on which a taxpayer could claim a deduction. The IRS audited Voss and Sophy and determined that as co-owners of the house they were jointly subject to the $1.1 million limit. The IRS thus disallowed a portion of each of their claimed deductions. Voss and Sophy brought suit in tax court. The tax court affirmed the IRS’s determination. Voss and Sophy appealed. The IRS presented a 2009 memorandum from its Chief Counsel, which stated the debt limit applies on a per-residence basis.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bybee, J.)
Dissent (Ikuta, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.