Vought v. Teachers College, Columbia University
New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
127 A.D.2d 654, 511 N.Y.S.2d 880 (1987)
- Written by Mike Begovic, JD
Facts
Michael Vought (plaintiff) applied to the Teachers College at Columbia University (Teachers College) (defendant). Having already accumulated 60 credits at Columbia University, Vought was interested in an accelerated program offered by the Teachers College, which would grant him a Bachelor of Science degree (B.S.) and a Master of Arts degree (M.A.) after two more years of study, saving him one full year of study. Vought received an advisory statement from Teachers College referring to the possibility of granting him both a B.S. and M.A., and subsequently a letter from Teachers College stating that his application for the combined-degree program was pending approval. Vought’s letter of acceptance from the Teachers College noted that his admission would lead to an M.A. However, Vought was told that his application for the combined program was still pending. After six months, Vought was informed that his application for the combined program would not be approved in time. Vought continued his undergraduate studies at Columbia University and, despite not being able to enroll in the combined program, obtained an M.A. the traditional way, as a separate degree program. Vought filed suit against Teachers College for breach of contract, fraud, and negligence. A lower court granted Teachers College’s motion for summary judgment, rejecting Vought’s argument that Teachers College promised him a combined degree and relying in part on Vought’s own testimony as to his awareness that his application for the combined program was never officially approved. Vought appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.