Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Vulcan Metals Co. v. Simmons Manufacturing Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
248 F. 853 (2d Cir. 1918)


Facts

Simmons Manufacturing Co. (Simmons) (defendant) sold to Vulcan Metals Co. (Vulcan) (plaintiff) all of its patents, tools, and equipment for manufacturing vacuum cleaners, as well as all the parts it had on hand for this purpose. In negotiating the sale, Simmons represented to Albert Freeman, a Vulcan promoter, that the vacuum machines were superior to others in terms of their cleanliness, affordability, efficiency, and ease of use. Additionally, Simmons represented that it had not previously tried to sell the vacuum cleaners, that it had not shown the technology to anyone, and that no one else knew about it and it had never been on the market. At the time, Simmons had 15,000 vacuum units on hand. Vulcan purchased the materials from Simmons based on these recommendations. However, Vulcan later brought suit against Simmons on the ground that its statements were false. Vulcan claimed the machines and patents were “totally inefficient and unmarketable.” Additionally, at trial, Vulcan presented evidence that Simmons had previously unsuccessfully attempted to sell the machines on several occasions. The trial court directed a verdict for Simmons after finding the company’s representations contained no actionable fraud. Vulcan appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (L. Hand, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 204,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.