Wainwright Securities, Inc. v. Wall Street Transcript Corp.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
558 F.2d 91 (1977)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
H. C. Wainwright Company (Wainwright) (plaintiff), a broker-dealer, specialized in preparing in-depth financial and business reports about publicly traded corporations for use by major banks, investment firms, and industry clients. Each report took several months to prepare and featured Wainwright’s financial analyses, conclusions, and predictions. All of Wainwright’s reports were copyrighted. Wall Street Transcript Corporation (WST) (defendant) published a widely available weekly newspaper focusing on business, financial, and economic news. In each newspaper, WST featured a column containing abstracts of institutional research reports, including Wainwright’s. The abstracts WST published substantially copied the analyses and conclusions from Wainwright’s reports without adding any independent research, analysis, commentary, or critique. WST’s advertising campaign promoted the column as a way for WST’s readers to get easy, fast access to major institutional research reports. Wainwright sued WST for copyright infringement seeking injunctive relief and monetary damages. WST countered, arguing that WST’s abstracts of Wainwright’s reports constituted fair use and that the abstracts were legitimate news reports about objective facts protected by the First Amendment. The district court granted Wainwright’s request for a preliminary injunction, holding that WST’s column was not fair use because it substantially copied Wainwright’s research reports. WST appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Mishler, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.