From our private database of 47,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Lemaire

Arizona Court of Appeals
242 Ariz. 357 (2017)

Written by Serena Lipski, JD

Facts

Kathi Buss (plaintiff) suffered a slip and fall in an Oregon store operated by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Wal-Mart) (defendant). Buss filed suit against Wal-Mart in an Arizona state court. Wal-Mart, incorporated in Delaware and with an Arkansas principal place of business, operated 127 retail locations and four distribution centers in Arizona. In 2014 Wal-Mart was Arizona’s largest employer, with approximately 34,000 employees in Arizona out of Wal-Mart’s 2.3 million employees. Wal-Mart moved to dismiss Buss’s suit for lack of personal jurisdiction. The trial court held that Wal-Mart was subject to general personal jurisdiction in Arizona because of its significant presence in Arizona. Wal-Mart appealed. Buss argued that by appointing an agent for service of process in Arizona, Wal-Mart had consented to general jurisdiction, and that Wal-Mart’s sheer magnitude of activities in Arizona meant that Wal-Mart was at home in Arizona.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Swann, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
The procedural disposition (e.g., reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 966,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.
Unlock this case brief Read our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.
Learn about our approach Read more about Quimbee

Here's why 966,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,007 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Here's why 966,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
47,500 briefs - keyed to 1,007 casebooks
Uniform format for every case brief
Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
Top-notch customer support