Waldorf v. Shuta

142 F.3d 601 (1998)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Waldorf v. Shuta

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
142 F.3d 601 (1998)

Facts

Mark Waldorf (plaintiff) became a quadriplegic because of injuries he sustained in a car accident. During his personal-injury action, one of the defendants offered the expert testimony of Dennis Rizzo on the subject of vocational rehabilitation and the jobs available for a quadriplegic. Rizzo did not have any formal training in the field. Rizzo had a master’s degree in sociology and social organization and spent much of his early career working in a field unrelated to vocational rehabilitation. In recent years, however, Rizzo worked to evaluate employment opportunities for individuals with disabilities, and as part of his job, he became familiar with studies on work quadriplegics can perform. Rizzo also used the New Jersey Department of Labor Statistics and the New Jersey Job Listing Book regarding employment opportunities in various job categories in the state. Over Waldorf’s objection, the court qualified Rizzo as an expert witness. During Rizzo’s testimony, he used the New Jersey Department of Labor Statistics and the New Jersey Job Listing Book. Following a judgment in his favor, Waldorf moved for a new trial on the basis of the court’s qualification of Rizzo as an expert witness, among other things.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Greenberg, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 821,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership