Walker v. Goldsmith
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
902 F.2d 16 (1990)
- Written by Arlyn Katen, JD
Facts
An Arizona state court jury convicted William Walker (defendant) of aggravated assault and leaving the scene of an accident. Walker petitioned for postconviction relief in state court, arguing that the venire pool entirely excluded people whose last names began with the letters W, X, Y, and Z (the proposed class), in violation of Walker’s Sixth Amendment right to a jury representing a fair cross section of the community and his Fourteenth Amendment right to equal protection. Walker argued that the proposed class constituted a distinct class, relying upon a study showing that people whose last names begin with S through Z are 50 percent more likely to develop “alphabetic neurosis” than people whose last names begin with A through R. Arizona state courts refused to recognize the proposed class as a distinct class. Walker then raised the argument in a habeas corpus petition in federal district court. After the district court summarily denied Walker’s petition, Walker appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
