Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Walker v. Pierce

560 F.2d 609 (1977)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 33,600+ case briefs...

Walker v. Pierce

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

560 F.2d 609 (1977)

Facts

Dr. Clovis Pierce (defendant) was an obstetrician who worked at a county hospital. Pierce had a policy of asking anyone who was financially unable to care for themselves to agree to be sterilized after the birth of a third child. If the person did not agree, Pierce asked the person to seek care from a different doctor. Virgil Walker (plaintiff) was a Black female with a seventh-grade education. Walker was separated from her husband, receiving Medicaid and other public benefits, and pregnant with her fourth child when she sought care from Pierce. Pierce told Walker about his sterilization policy during their first two visits together. Even though Walker claimed that Pierce threatened to have her public benefits taken away if she refused to consent to sterilization, she did not agree to sterilization during either visit. After Walker’s efforts to obtain a different doctor were unsuccessful, she returned to Pierce for care and signed a sterilization-consent form. Later, Dr. Billy Burke was covering for Pierce and delivered Walker’s baby. Burke spoke to Walker about sterilization. Walker told Burke that she did not want more children and that she consented to permanent sterilization. Walker signed two additional consent forms before the sterilization surgery was finally performed by Pierce. Walker later claimed that she felt it would have been futile to resist the sterilization requests. Walker’s medical bills were paid by Medicaid, with whom Pierce did not have any contractual relationship. Walker and another Black, female patient sued Pierce, claiming that he had unlawfully discriminated against them on the basis of their race, number of children, and Medicaid status. A jury entered verdicts in favor of Pierce. Walker appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bryan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 602,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 602,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 602,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 33,600 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership