Walker v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
47 Cal.3d 112, 763 P.2d 852 (1988)
- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
Laurie Walker was a member of a church that espoused treating illnesses with prayer rather than medical care. Walker’s four-year-old daughter, Shauntay, fell ill with flu-like symptoms and a stiff neck. Walker refused to seek any medical care for her child, and instead attempted to treat Shauntay with prayer. Shauntay’s condition deteriorated as she lost weight, became disoriented, and had difficulty breathing, and seventeen days after falling ill she died. Walker was charged with involuntary manslaughter and felony child endangerment. Walker contended that her actions were legally insufficient to constitute criminal culpability for involuntary manslaughter, and that her actions were constitutionally protected as a free exercise of religion, but her motion to dismiss the charges were denied. Walker filed a petition to the court of appeal for a writ of prohibition and a stay, which were summarily denied. The Supreme Court of California granted Walker’s petition for review, and then transferred the matter back to the court of appeal. Upon further briefing and oral arguments, the court of appeal again denied Walker’s petition. The Supreme Court of California then granted Walker’s second petition for review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Mosk, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.