Walker v. Walker

86 N.Y.2d 624 (1995)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Walker v. Walker

New York Court of Appeals
86 N.Y.2d 624 (1995)

  • Written by Haley Gintis, JD

Facts

Emma Walker (Emma) (plaintiff) obtained an order of protection against her former husband, Fred Walker (Fred) (defendant). In 1993, Fred was sentenced to jail for repeatedly violating the protection order. Following Fred’s incarceration, the family court issued a new order of protection that prohibited Fred from contacting Emma. However, while incarcerated, Fred continuously sent Emma written communications. Emma filed a petition, claiming that Fred had violated the new protection order. The family court held a hearing and concluded that Fred had violated the order on three separate occasions. The family court then sentenced Fred to serve three consecutives six-month sentences for the three violations. Fred appealed, arguing that the family court could not impose consecutive sentences for multiple violations of the same order of protection. The appellate division affirmed the family court’s sentencing over the dissenting opinion of two justices. The matter was appealed again. The New York Court of Appeals considered whether the family court had the authority to issue consecutive sentences.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bellacosa, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership