Wallace v. Rosen
Court of Appeals of Indiana
765 N.E.2d 192 (2002)
- Written by Michael Beverly, JD
Facts
Rosen (defendant) was a teacher at Northwest High School during an unannounced fire drill one week after a fire was extinguished near her classroom. Wallace (plaintiff), who was recovering from foot surgery, was at the school delivering homework to her daughter on the day of the fire drill. Wallace stopped near the top of a staircase to talk to her daughter and her daughter’s friends. At that moment the fire alarm sounded, Wallace took a couple of steps up to the second floor as students filed down the stairs. Rosen escorted her class to the stairway where she noticed three or four people, including Wallace, whom she did not know, blocking the stairs. Rosen approached the stairs and told everyone to continue moving. Wallace, whose back was to Rosen, never heard Rosen over the alarm noise. Rosen placed her fingertips on Wallace’s back to get her attention and told her to proceed quickly down the stairs during the fire drill. Wallace sued Rosen and the school system for damages. Wallace testified that Rosen had pushed her down the stairs. Rosen denied pushing Wallace and claimed that Wallace had walked down the stairs unassisted. The court refused to instruct the jury on battery. The jury found in favor of Rosen and the school system. Wallace appealed to the Court of Appeals of Indiana.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kirsch, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.