Wallin v. Fuller

476 F.2d 1204 (1973)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Wallin v. Fuller

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
476 F.2d 1204 (1973)

Facts

Carl Wallin died when his car collided with a car driven by Allen Fuller (defendant) on a two-lane highway. Wallin was insured by Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (Nationwide) (defendant). Marsha Lee Wallin (plaintiff), Carl Wallin’s widow, filed suit against Nationwide seeking a declaratory judgment that Fuller’s negligence caused Mr. Wallin’s death. The defendants denied that Fuller was negligent and claimed that Mr. Wallin had been contributorily negligent. At issue was whether the accident occurred in Mr. Wallin’s right or left lane. Fuller had a passenger in his car at the time of the accident, George Mayes. During Mayes’s deposition, he testified that Mr. Wallin had pulled out to pass a car and was in his left lane (Fuller’s right lane). Mayes further testified that Fuller did not slow down even when he saw Mr. Wallin in his lane, Mayes had to shout at Fuller to slam on his brakes, and at the last second Fuller did brake but skidded into Mr. Wallin. During the trial, Mayes testified and Fuller corroborated Mayes’s testimony, admitting that the accident might not have happened if he had slowed down even a little. No objections were made. Mrs. Wallin objected to the jury instructions because they did not include subsequent negligence or wanton conduct and moved to amend her pleadings to include those issues. The court overruled Mrs. Wallin’s objection and denied her motion because the issues were not in the pretrial order. The jury found in favor of the defendants. Mrs. Wallin appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wisdom, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership