Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Walliser v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court
72 T.C. 433 (1974)


James Walliser, a Texas bank officer, was responsible for making loans to Texas builders, and his compensation was dependent in part on his success in marketing these loans. The bank did not reimburse Walliser for the costs of his marketing activity, but the bank considered marketing activity important, gave Walliser time off to pursue this activity, and took this activity into account in setting Walliser’s compensation. At their own expense, Walliser and his wife (plaintiffs) traveled on recreational tours that major companies organized for the benefit of Texas builders. Walliser did not conduct formal business meetings or undertake specific loan negotiations on these tours. However, Walliser spent most of his touring time socializing in order to develop personal relationships with the builders. Both Walliser and the bank valued this socializing because it fostered builder goodwill, which could lead to future loan business. Walliser and his wife deducted Walliser’s tour expenses from their gross income as tax-deductible business expenses under § 162(a)(2) of the federal tax code. The commissioner of internal revenue (commissioner) (defendant) determined that Walliser’s tour expenditures were for personal and customer entertainment, amusement, or recreation (EAR). Under § 274 of the tax code, these EAR expenses were not tax deductible, and the commissioner accordingly disallowed the Wallisers’ § 162(a)(2) tax deduction. The Wallisers paid the tax and petitioned for a refund in tax court.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.


The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Tannenwald, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 222,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.