Walsh v. Wilkie

32 Vet. App. 300 (2020)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Walsh v. Wilkie

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
32 Vet. App. 300 (2020)

Facts

Elizabeth Walsh (plaintiff) injured both knees while training in the US Army Reserves. Over the following years, Walsh was granted service connection for bilateral knee conditions, low-back disability, and arthritis in both hips. Walsh later also sought disability compensation for hypertension and sleep apnea. A Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) (defendant) examiner reported that both conditions were likely connected to Walsh’s obesity. The regional office (RO) denied the claims and Walsh appealed to the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (the board). On appeal to the board, Walsh reported that she was active and athletic prior to her injuries during service. The board remanded the claims to the RO instructing an examiner to consider whether Walsh’s obesity, as a cause of the sleep apnea and hypertension, might have been caused or aggravated by Walsh’s service-connected disabilities. Before the RO issued another decision on the claim, G.C. Precedent Opinion 1-2017 was issued, stating that obesity was not a disease or injury and could therefore not be the basis for a service-connected disability but that obesity could be an intermediate step between an existing service-connected disability and a current secondary service-connected disability. The RO then requested a report on Walsh’s claims from a new examiner in accordance with 1-2017. The examiner concluded that there was no clear-cut cause-effect relationship between Walsh’s disabilities (knee pain, back pain, and arthritis) and obesity. The RO and subsequently the board relied on this report in finding that Walsh’s obesity could not be attributed to Walsh’s service-connected disabilities and denied a service connection for hypertension and sleep apnea. Walsh appealed, and on appeal Walsh argued that the VA examiner, the RO, and the board had failed to consider whether Walsh’s obesity was aggravated by service-connected disabilities, as required by 1-2017.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Toth, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership