Logourl black
From our private database of 13,000+ case briefs...

Walters v. National Association of Radiation Survivors

United States Supreme Court
473 U.S. 305 (1985)


Facts

By statute, Congress created an administrative system through which veterans may receive benefit awards, overseen by the Veterans Administration (VA). The level of these awards is determined by the degree of disability the veteran experiences and whether or not the injury is service connected. These hearings are intended to be fact-finding proceedings and are designed to be non-adversarial and informal, in part because of the large volume of cases the VA must process and in part because the VA intends to avoid needlessly denying valid claims. The hearings are governed by the parameters described in 38 U.S.C. §§ 301 et seq., which provides, in part, that attorneys’ fees in these awards hearings must not exceed $10, with criminal penalties for violation of the statute. Three veterans, a veteran’s widow, and two veterans’ advocacy groups, including the National Association of Radiation Survivors (defendant), challenged the attorneys’ fees provision, alleging that it denied them the opportunity to acquire legal representation and therefore hampered their ability to present their case, in violation of the First and Fifth Amendments. The district court ordered a preliminary injunction against enforcement of the statute, finding that the process was fundamentally unfair without representation of counsel, and noting that several of the defendants seeking representation were turned down by attorneys solely because of the fee restriction. The government (plaintiff) appealed, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Rehnquist, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Dissent (Stevens, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 129,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,000 briefs, keyed to 177 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.