Logourl black
From our private database of 12,700+ case briefs...

Walters v. Reno

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
145 F.3d 1032 (9th Cir. 1998)


Facts

Walters, et al. (plaintiffs) brought suit against the federal government (defendant), claiming that the procedures used by the INS to obtain final orders in immigration document fraud cases violated their procedural due process rights. The INS was able to issue unappealable final orders (which usually resulted in deportation) against aliens charged with document fraud if the aliens did not request a hearing within 60 days of receiving notice of intent to fine and notice of rights forms. The plaintiffs claimed that the forms were confusing and misleading and did not adequately inform the aliens of their rights. The plaintiffs moved to certify a class of about 4,000 aliens who had been or were subject to final orders. The district court certified the class and granted its motion for summary judgment and injunctive relief. The government appealed. The appeal with respect to the class certification claimed that countless individual proceedings would result from the district court’s injunction, thus reducing judicial efficiency contrary to the purposes of Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The government also contended that the factual differences among the class members render the certification inappropriate.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Reinhardt, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 121,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 12,700 briefs, keyed to 172 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.