Wang v. Bear Stearns Companies, LLC

14 F. Supp. 3d 537 (2014)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Wang v. Bear Stearns Companies, LLC

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
14 F. Supp. 3d 537 (2014)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

Joey Zhou and Garrett Bland (defendants) worked for Bear Stearns Companies, LLC (BS) (defendant). Zhou provided investment advice to Vivine Wang (plaintiff) and her husband, Roger (the Wangs). Vivine opened a BS account in early 2008. The customer agreement provided that BS was acting as a broker-dealer and did not have the fiduciary duties an investment adviser had to its clients. On March 6, Roger placed an order for BS common stock. The following week, there were rumors about BS having liquidity problems. Roger ordered additional BS shares on March 10 and 11. Bland allegedly told Roger on March 11 that BS was a sound investment, its stock value should be at least $85 per share, and it was a great time to invest in BS. On March 14, BS announced it had received a $30 billion loan facility, and BS’s stock price fell $27. Later that day, Roger placed a 200,000-share order, half of which was filled at $34 per share. Two days later, BS announced that JPMorgan would purchase BS for the equivalent of $2 per share. The Wangs refused to pay for their stock. Vivine sued BS, Zhou, and Bland for securities fraud and breach of fiduciary duty, alleging that Zhou should have advised the Wangs not to buy additional BS stock on March 14 and was incentivized to commit fraud in order to earn commissions, and that Bland’s statements to Roger on March 11 were actionable fraud. Zhou and Bland moved to dismiss the claims.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Sweet, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership