Ward-Allen v. Gaskins
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
989 A.2d 185 (2010)
- Written by Mary Pfotenhauer, JD
Facts
Anna Creech (Creech) executed a will that provided several specific bequests, gave the residue of her estate to her nieces and nephews, and nominated her nephew, Cleveland Mitchell (Mitchell) as personal representative, with her niece, Lettie Gaskins, as the alternate. Creech later executed a codicil to the will, changing the specific bequests, including making specific bequests to her grand-niece, Bobbie Jean Ward-Allen (Ward-Allen), and nominating Ward-Allen as the alternate personal representative. After Creech’s death, Mitchell renounced his appointment as personal representative. Ward-Allen filed Creech’s original will and a copy of the codicil with the register of wills, and sought appointment as personal representative. Gaskins objected to the admission of the codicil, because the original had not been filed. Ward-Allen claimed she previously had possession of the original codicil, and at some point sent it to Mitchell because he was nominated as personal representative. The trial court admitted the entire will into to probate, but refused to admit the copy of the codicil, holding that Ward-Allen had failed to show what had happened to the original codicil. Ward-Allen appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Fisher, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.