Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 17,300+ case briefs...

Ward v. State

Indiana Supreme Court
50 N.E.3d 752 (2016)


On April 10, 2013, after Dee Ward (defendant) dropped off his girlfriend, J.M., at her mother and stepfather’s house. J.M.’s stepfather called 911 to report that J.M. had been beaten. When the paramedic arrived at the scene, she found J.M. lying in the fetal position and crying. J.M.’s body was covered with bruises, and she was in severe pain. When the paramedic asked J.M. what happened, J.M. told the paramedic that Ward had beaten her with a belt. The paramedic transported J.M. to the hospital to be evaluated for internal injuries. In the emergency room, a forensic nurse examined J.M. and took J.M.’s medical history. When the nurse asked J.M. what happened to her, J.M. told the nurse that Ward had struck her with a belt. The nurse took precautions to make sure that J.M. would be discharged to a safe location. The nurse also gave J.M. referrals to domestic-violence support organizations and recommended counseling. Ward was charged with battering J.M. When J.M. failed to appear for depositions or testify at trial, the State of Indiana (plaintiff) introduced J.M.’s statements to the paramedic and nurse into evidence. The paramedic explained during testimony that she asked J.M. what happened and who hurt her so that the paramedic could properly treat J.M. and determine whether she was in further danger from her attacker. The nurse testified that the hospital’s violence-victim-treatment protocol required the nurse to determine who caused the injuries and how they occurred, as well as to formulate a plan for J.M.’s continued safety after discharge. Ward objected to the introduction of J.M.’s statements, arguing that they were testimonial hearsay that violated his constitutional rights to confront the witnesses against him. The trial court admitted the statements over Ward’s objection. Ward was convicted, and he appealed.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Rush, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 457,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 457,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 17,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial