Warner Brothers Inc. and Metronome Video ApS v. Erik Viuff Christiansen
European Court of Justice
Case No. 158/86 (1988)
- Written by Jody Stuart, JD
Facts
Warner Brothers Inc. (Warner) (plaintiff) owned the United Kingdom (UK) copyright for a film that it had produced. Videos of the film were sold in the UK with Warner’s consent. Warner assigned management of the film’s video-production rights in Denmark to Metronome Video ApS (Metronome) (plaintiff). Erik Viuff Christiansen (defendant) bought a videocassette of the film in the UK and imported it into Denmark to rent out the video in his Denmark video shop. Warner and Metronome obtained an injunction in Danish court prohibiting Christiansen from renting out the video in Denmark. Christiansen argued that Warner was at liberty to choose in which member states of the European Economic Community to market its film and had to consider whether a member state had legislation providing an exclusive right to the rental market. Christiansen further argued that by selling a film in the UK, a member state that did not offer exclusive rental-market rights, a filmmaker must accept the consequences that the right to restrain rentals in any other member state would be exhausted. The Danish court requested a preliminary ruling from the European Court of Justice regarding the interpretation of Articles 30 and 36 of the European Economic Community (EEC) Treaty.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.