Warner Chappell Music, Inc. v. Nealy

601 U.S. 366, 144 S. Ct. 1135 (2024)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Warner Chappell Music, Inc. v. Nealy

United States Supreme Court
601 U.S. 366, 144 S. Ct. 1135 (2024)

SC

Facts

Sherman Nealy (plaintiff) and Tony Butler released an album and several other songs under the name Music Specialist, Inc. (MSI). Soon after, Nealy went to jail on drug charges. Nealy got out of jail in 2015. While Nealy was in jail, unbeknownst to him, Butler executed a licensing deal with Warner Chappell Music, Inc. (Warner) (defendant), permitting Warner to use the MSI works. In 2018, Nealy sued Warner for copyright infringement. Nealy claimed that the infringing activities began in 2008. Nealy relied on the discovery rule, which stated that the Copyright Act’s statute of limitations did not begin to run until the copyright owner discovered the infringing use. Nealy stated that because he was in jail, he was not aware of the infringing acts until after he got out, in 2016. Warner argued that even though Nealy could bring suit under the discovery rule for infringing acts that occurred more than three years prior, he could not recover damages for such acts. The district court agreed with Warner. The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit reversed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kagan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership