Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Warner v. Haught, Inc.

Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia
329 S.E.2d 88 (W. Va. 1985)


Facts

In 1979, Richard Warner (plaintiff) leased a tract of land to D. & H. Oil Company (DHOC). The lease provided that DHOC would pay an annual rental amount to Warner until, but not after, a producing well was drilled on the land. The lease also contained a surrender clause, under which DHOC could voluntarily surrender its interest in the lease. DHOC assigned the lease to Haught, Inc. (Haught) (defendant). In 1981, Haught failed to make a timely rental payment to Warner. Warner brought suit in the Circuit Court of Pendleton County, seeking a declaratory judgment that the lease had been forfeited and abandoned as a result of the failure to pay. Haught argued that the lease was still valid because Warner had failed to comply with a West Virginia statute requiring that an oil and gas lessor make a demand for payment before terminating a lease for nonpayment. The circuit court granted Haught’s motion for summary judgment. Warner appealed, arguing that the statute in question applied only to “or” leases and did not apply to “unless” leases. Warner claimed that its lease was an unless lease because of an oral statement made by a Haught agent indicating that the lease would be void if Haught did not pay a rental on time.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (McGraw, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 222,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.