Warner v. Haught, Inc.
Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia
329 S.E.2d 88 (W. Va. 1985)
In 1979, Richard Warner (plaintiff) leased a tract of land to D. & H. Oil Company (DHOC). The lease provided that DHOC would pay an annual rental amount to Warner until, but not after, a producing well was drilled on the land. The lease also contained a surrender clause, under which DHOC could voluntarily surrender its interest in the lease. DHOC assigned the lease to Haught, Inc. (Haught) (defendant). In 1981, Haught failed to make a timely rental payment to Warner. Warner brought suit in the Circuit Court of Pendleton County, seeking a declaratory judgment that the lease had been forfeited and abandoned as a result of the failure to pay. Haught argued that the lease was still valid because Warner had failed to comply with a West Virginia statute requiring that an oil and gas lessor make a demand for payment before terminating a lease for nonpayment. The circuit court granted Haught’s motion for summary judgment. Warner appealed, arguing that the statute in question applied only to “or” leases and did not apply to “unless” leases. Warner claimed that its lease was an unless lease because of an oral statement made by a Haught agent indicating that the lease would be void if Haught did not pay a rental on time.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (McGraw, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.