Warrenton Fiber Co. v. Department of Energy
Oregon Court of Appeals
283 Or. App. 270 (2016)
- Written by Abby Roughton, JD
Facts
The State of Oregon had a statutory biomass-tax-credit program that allowed tax credits for agricultural producers or biomass collectors who produced or collected biomass in Oregon and used the biomass in Oregon as biofuel or to produce biofuel. The statute defined biomass to include organic matter derived from “forest or rangeland woody debris from harvesting or thinning” conducted to improve the forest’s or rangeland’s ecological health and reduce wildfire risk. The statute excluded sawdust and other types of residual log-mill wood waste from the definition of biomass. The Oregon legislature tasked the Oregon Department of Energy (ODOE) (defendant) with establishing procedures and criteria for determining the amount of the biomass tax credit for which a taxpayer qualified and certifying taxpayers eligible to claim the credit. Warrenton Fiber Company (Warrenton) (plaintiff) purchased tree logs and hauled the logs to its facility. Warrenton then stripped the bark from the logs, turned the stripped logs into wood chips, and sold some of the stripped bark as “hog fuel.” Warrenton sought a biomass-tax-credit certification from ODOE based on its sale of hog fuel, but ODOE denied Warrenton’s application based on the statute’s exclusion of mill-related wood waste from the definition of biomass. Warrenton challenged ODOE’s decision in an Oregon state court, arguing that the hog fuel fell within the definition of biomass because the trees used in Warrenton’s mill operations originally came from harvesting or thinning conducted to improve forest or rangeland ecological health. The trial court granted summary judgment in Warrenton’s favor, and ODOE appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Flynn, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 796,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.