Warrington v. State
Delaware Supreme Court
840 A.2d 590 (2003)

- Written by Kelli Lanski, JD
Facts
Jesse Pecco made an arrangement with brothers Robert Warrington (Wes) and Andrew Warrington (Drew) (defendants) to collect money Wes owed him. Pecco went to the Warringtons’ house and entered through the unlocked front door. He had a knife with him. A struggle ensued. Wes and Drew fought with Pecco to take control of the knife, and Drew grabbed a fireplace poker. Wes and Drew stabbed Pecco with the knife and hit him over the head with the poker multiple times. At some point, a 911 call was made from the house, and the recording included Pecco asking the brothers not to kill him and pleading with them to show him mercy. In response, Drew kicked Pecco and told him to shut up. Pecco died from his injuries. The Warringtons were convicted of first-degree murder after the judge instructed the jury that self-defense was not an available defense if the Warringtons, even if initially justified in using force against Pecco, used deadly force after the danger to them had passed. The Warringtons appealed, arguing that they killed Pecco in self-defense.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Berger, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.