United States Supreme Court
422 U.S. 490 (1975)
Several plaintiffs filed suit against the town of Penfield, New York and members of the town’s zoning, planning, and municipal boards (defendants) to challenge the constitutionality of certain zoning ordinances. The plaintiffs included civic and business associations, taxpayers from a neighboring municipality, and individuals claiming to have been disenfranchised of the opportunity to live in Penfield as a result of the zoning ordinances. The plaintiffs claimed that the zoning ordinances precluded the construction of affordable housing and had the effect of increasing the cost of housing in Penfield beyond the reach of low and middle income individuals. The plaintiffs filed suit in federal district court seeking a declaratory judgment finding the zoning ordinances unconstitutional, an injunction against enforcement, an injunction ordering the enactment of remedial ordinances and exemplary damages. The plaintiffs petitioned the United States Supreme Court for review of an appellate court decision holding that they lacked standing to pursue their claims.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Powell, J.)
Dissent (Douglas, J.)
Dissent (Brennan, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.