Washington State Department of Licensing v. Cougar Den, Inc.

139 S. Ct. 1000 (2019)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Washington State Department of Licensing v. Cougar Den, Inc.

United States Supreme Court
139 S. Ct. 1000 (2019)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

In 1855, the Yakama Nation (Yakama) entered into a treaty with the United States (1855 treaty) under which the Yakama ceded 10 million acres of land in what would eventually become Washington State. In exchange, the Yakama received payment and certain treaty-reserved rights, including the right to travel freely on all public highways. The Yakama’s way of life involved extensive trading throughout the region. At the treaty negotiations, United States representatives explicitly promised the Yakama that their treaty-reserved right to free travel on public highways included the right to transport goods without restriction. The treaty was negotiated in Chinook jargon, which was not a language the Yakama spoke fluently, and it was memorialized in English, a language that the Yakama neither spoke nor read. Washington state law levied a tax (the fuel-import tax) on all motor-vehicle fuel imported from out of state using ground transportation, including public highways. Cougar Den, Inc. (defendant), a Yakama-owned wholesale fuel importer incorporated under Yakama law, was the primary importer of motor-vehicle fuel sold on the Yakama Reservation. The Washington State Department of Licensing (department) (plaintiff) assessed Cougar Den $3.6 million in taxes, fees, and penalties pursuant to Washington’s fuel import tax. Cougar Den appealed the assessment, arguing that the fuel import tax was preempted by the Yakama’s treaty-reserved right to unrestricted use of public highways for transporting goods. After exhausting the administrative appeals process, the department affirmed its decision to enforce the assessment. Cougar Den appealed to the state trial court. The trial court reversed, holding that the fuel import tax was preempted by the 1855 treaty. On appeal, the Washington Supreme Court affirmed. The department appealed to the United States Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Breyer, J.)

Concurrence (Gorsuch, J.)

Dissent (Kavanaugh, J.)

Dissent (Roberts, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership