From our private database of 35,400+ case briefs...
Washington Times-Herald v. District of Columbia
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
213 F.2d 23, 94 U.S. App. D.C. 154 (1954)
The Washington Times-Herald (the Times-Herald) (plaintiff) was a newspaper-publishing company. The Times-Herald contracted with companies that produced photoengraved mats that were printed with comic strips. The comic-strip companies sent the Times-Herald photoengraved mats, which the Times-Herald used to produce metal plates from which comic pages for newspapers were printed. The Times-Herald paid the comic-strip companies for the photoengraved mats, which cost substantially more than blank mats. For example, one photoengraved mat could cost $30, whereas the Times-Herald could purchase a blank mat for $0.22. The Times-Herald was taxed under the District of Columbia Use Tax Act for the full price of the photoengraved mats. The District of Columbia Tax Court held that this tax was appropriate because the Times-Herald’s purchase of the photoengraved mats was a retail purchase within the meaning of the Use Tax Act. The Times-Herald appealed the tax court’s decision, arguing that the photoengraved mats were exempt from sales and use taxes in the District of Columbia. The District of Columbia’s regulations related to the Use Tax Act exempted from sales and use taxes professional services involving sales of personal property that were inconsequential elements of the professional service purchased. The regulations explained that the sale of personal property was an inconsequential element if the price of the personal property was less than 10 percent of the price of the service rendered. Given the substantial price difference between a photoengraved mat and a blank mat, the Times-Herald reasoned that the purchase of the photoengraved mat was an exempt purchase of a professional service, namely, photoengraving.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Miller, J.)
Concurrence (Stephens, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 617,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 617,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,400 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.