Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Washington v. Indiana High School Athletic Association, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
181 F.3d 840 (1999)


Facts

Eric Washington (plaintiff) was a student with a learning disability living in Indiana. During elementary school and middle school, Washington was often allowed to advance to the next grade despite academic failings. However, Washington repeated the eighth grade. Even though Washington still earned failing grades during his second eighth-grade year, Washington was permitted to advance to ninth grade at Lafayette Jefferson High School at the beginning of the second semester of the 1994-95 academic year. Washington continued to earn poor grades, and a school counselor suggested that Washington drop out of high school. Washington took that advice and dropped out. Subsequently, Washington met Chad Dunwoody, the basketball coach at Central Catholic High School (CCHS) (plaintiff). Dunwoody encouraged Washington to attend CCHS and play basketball. Dunwoody also became Washington’s academic mentor. Washington began attending CCHS during the 1997-98 academic year. For the first time, Washington was diagnosed as learning disabled. However, the Indiana High School Athletic Association (IHSAA) (defendant) had a rule that limited athletic eligibility to eight semesters following the student’s commencement of the ninth grade. Under this rule, Washington would lose eligibility after the first semester of the 1998-99 academic year. The purposes of the rule were to discourage redshirting, protect student safety, promote competitive equality, and promote the idea that academics should take priority over athletics. CCHS applied for a waiver of the rule, and IHSAA denied the waiver. Washington and CCHS sued IHSAA, alleging that the failure to grant a waiver violated Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Washington and CCHS requested a preliminary injunction to stop IHSAA from denying eligibility for the second semester of the 1998-99 academic year. The district court granted the preliminary injunction, and IHSAA appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Ripple, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 222,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.