Logourl black
From our private database of 13,300+ case briefs...

Wasik v. Borg

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
423 F.2d 44 (1970)


Robert W. Borg (defendant) was driving a station wagon produced by Ford Motor Company (Ford). Borg collided with Albert J. Wasik (plaintiff), injuring Wasik and damaging his vehicle. Wasik sued Borg in the United States District Court for the District of Vermont under its diversity jurisdiction. Borg claimed that the station wagon’s throttle cable was in “runaway condition.” Therefore, Borg filed a third-party complaint against Ford alleging that the station wagon had abruptly accelerated “due to a dangerous defect in the design or the manufacture of the automobile.” In its answer, Ford denied all of Borg’s allegations and raised a defense of contributory negligence. Ford was represented at trial and treated in all respects as a defendant with the potential for direct liability. In fact, Wasik’s attorney seemed to adopt Borg’s narrative. Ford was permitted to cross-examine both parties. The jury determined that Borg was not negligent, but held Ford liable for damages totaling $8,700. Ford appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.


The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Feinberg, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 139,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,300 briefs, keyed to 182 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.