Waste Management, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency

669 F. Supp. 536 (1987)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Waste Management, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency

United States District Court for the District of Columbia
669 F. Supp. 536 (1987)

Facts

The Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act required parties to obtain a permit from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (defendant) before dumping hazardous materials in the ocean. The requirement was construed to apply to both dumping materials into the ocean and burning materials on ocean vessels, a process known as ocean incineration. However, the problems and consequences associated with ocean incineration differed from those associated with ocean dumping. Consequently, in 1983, the EPA started developing new regulations specific to ocean incineration. In 1984, the EPA announced it would defer acceptance and review of applications for new ocean-incineration permits until the new regulations were promulgated. The EPA published proposed regulations in February 1985 and accepted public comment through June 1985. The EPA then considered those comments as it prepared to finalize the new regulations. The process remained ongoing in 1986. Waste Management, Inc. (plaintiff) wanted to engage in ocean incineration but could not obtain the required permits because of the EPA’s deferral policy. Waste Management sued the EPA, arguing that the EPA’s deferral policy constituted rulemaking because it effectively revoked the prior ocean-incineration rules. Waste Management argued that because the deferral policy constituted rulemaking, the EPA violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) by adopting the policy without providing notice and an opportunity for public comment. Both parties moved for summary judgment.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Richey, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership