Water Splash, Inc. v. Menon

137 S.Ct. 1504 (2017)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Water Splash, Inc. v. Menon

United States Supreme Court
137 S.Ct. 1504 (2017)

Facts

Water Splash, Inc. (plaintiff) filed suit against Tara Menon (defendant), a Canadian resident, in a Texas state court, alleging that Menon had improperly worked for a competitor while still employed by Water Splash. The court permitted Water Splash to serve Menon by mail to Menon’s residence in Canada. Menon did not answer or appear in the lawsuit, resulting in the entry of a default judgment against Menon. Menon moved to vacate the default judgment on the grounds that service of process abroad by mail was improper. The trial court denied the motion. Menon appealed, arguing that the Hague Service Convention did not permit service by mail. The treaty’s history showed that its drafters, the executive branch, and other countries that signed it had all agreed that service by mail was allowed. Nevertheless, a majority of the Texas Court of Appeals sided in favor of Menon, holding that the Hague Service Convention prohibited service by mail, but did not consider whether this method of service was otherwise permitted under Texas law. Water Splash appealed to the United States Supreme Court, and certiorari was granted.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Alito, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership