Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
W

Waterloo Furniture Components v. Haworth, Inc.

467 F.3d 641 (2006)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Waterloo Furniture Components v. Haworth, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
467 F.3d 641 (2006)

DD

Facts

Haworth, Inc. (defendant) granted Waterloo Furniture Components, Ltd. (Waterloo) (plaintiff) a license to use a patent owned by Haworth. The license expired in October 2003. Additionally, Haworth sued SoftView Computer Products Corporation (SoftView) for patent infringement. Haworth and SoftView engaged in settlement negotiations and later executed a settlement agreement. If the settlement agreement was executed before Waterloo’s license expired, Waterloo could potentially pay a lower rate for using Haworth’s patent. Waterloo wanted to see the settlement agreement, but Haworth said that the agreement was confidential. Subsequently, Waterloo brought suit against Haworth. At the district court, Haworth offered testimony from one of its employees, James Wiersma. Wiersma was involved in the settlement negotiations between Haworth and SoftView, such that he had personal knowledge of the negotiations. Wiersma testified that Haworth executed its settlement agreement with SoftView in March 2004, after Waterloo’s license expired. The district court determined that Haworth was not required to provide the original document containing the settlement agreement. Haworth filed a motion for summary judgment, and the district court granted the motion. Waterloo appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Flaum, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Evidence

Key Terms