Waterman v. Mackenzie
United States Supreme Court
138 U.S. 252, 11 S. Ct. 334, 34 L. Ed. 923 (1891)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
Lewis Waterman (plaintiff) held a patent for an improvement to fountain pens. Waterman assigned the patent to his wife, who then granted Waterman the right to manufacture and sell the invention. Waterman’s wife later assigned all right, title, and interest in the patent to another party, subject to Waterman’s license to manufacture and sell. Waterman brought an infringement action against James Mackenzie (defendant) and Samuel Murphy (defendant). The circuit court found that Waterman was not the patent owner and thus had no standing to bring suit without joining the true patent owner as a plaintiff. Waterman appealed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gray, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.