Wathen v. Brown

48 Md. App. 655 (1981)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Wathen v. Brown

Maryland Court of Special Appeals
48 Md. App. 655 (1981)

JL

Facts

Helen Brown (plaintiff) owned the title to a parcel of property that included a 20-foot right-of-way. Norma Wathen (defendant) and her husband acknowledged a land survey in 1960 showing that the parcel and right-of-way were owned by Brown. However, Wathen had since been claiming ownership of the land and right-of-way through adverse possession. Brown sued Watson and sought a judgment to quiet title to the property. In the complaint, Brown alleged to be the owner of record title, the acknowledgement of the land survey, and the claim of adverse possession asserted by Wathen. The lawsuit proceeded to trial, and, at the close of proof, Wathen argued that Brown had failed to establish equitable jurisdiction. The proof at trial was limited to the deed of title and the plat survey. The trial court determined that it could draw an inference of possession from the evidence and entered an order in favor of Brown. Wathen appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lowe, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 821,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership