Watson v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Insurance Co.
Louisiana Supreme Court
469 So. 2d 967 (1985)
- Written by Mary Phelan D'Isa, JD
Facts
Ora Watson (plaintiff) filed a lawsuit against Earl Creel and his insurer, State Farm Fire and Casualty Insurance Company (defendants), for the wrongful death of Doyle Watson—her husband and the father of her seven children. Doyle died in a hunting accident when Earl’s minor son Shane was left alone with a high-powered rifle that he used to shoot Doyle in the head after he mistook him for a deer. Ora alleged that Earl was negligent because Earl gave Shane a high-powered rifle on Shane’s 12th birthday, because Earl did not properly instruct Shane how to use the rifle, and because Earl failed to properly supervise Shane at the time of the accident. Earl and Shane contended that their fault, if any, was very slight and that the accident would not have happened but for Doyle’s failure to wear a hunter-orange vest as required by Louisiana law or his failure to signal his presence when he walked into the area he had designated for hunting. The jury found Doyle 100% at fault and rendered a verdict for Earl and State Farm. The First Circuit Court of Appeal affirmed, after finding that a jury’s finding of fact should not be disturbed if it is based on a reasonable evaluation of credibility. Ora appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Calogero, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.