Watt v. Western Nuclear, Inc.
United States Supreme Court
462 U.S. 36 (1983)
Section 299 of the Stock-Raising Homestead Act of 1916 (SRHA), 43 U.S.C. § 299, reserved title to the federal government (government) (defendant) for all coal and “other minerals” in lands patented under the SRHA, while allowing homesteaders to settle the surface lands. Western Nuclear, Inc. (Western) (plaintiff) bought land from a seller whose predecessor had received an SRHA land patent. Western obtained a state permit to extract gravel from the land, and began mining activities. The Bureau of Land Management cited Western for trespassing against the federal mineral interest reserved in the SRHA patent. Western appealed to the Interior Board of Land Appeals (IBLA), which affirmed. Western sought review of the IBLA’s decision in federal district court, which ruled in the government’s favor. The court of appeals reversed, holding that gravel was not a mineral reserved to the government under the SRHA. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Marshall, J.)
Dissent (Powell, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.