Wausau Tile, Inc. v. County Concrete Corp.

226 Wis. 2d 235, 593 N.W.2d 445 (1999)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Wausau Tile, Inc. v. County Concrete Corp.

Wisconsin Supreme Court
226 Wis. 2d 235, 593 N.W.2d 445 (1999)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

Wausau Tile, Inc. (Wausau) (plaintiff) manufactured and sold concrete blocks called pavers. Wausau contracted with Medusa Corporation (defendant) to supply cement and with County Concrete Corporation (County) (defendant) to supply aggregate. Medusa’s express warranty stated it would remedy or replace cement that did not meet particular specifications but would have no further liability for general, special, or consequential damages. Wausau sued Medusa, County, and their insurers (defendants) for breach of warranty and contract, negligence, and strict liability. Wausau claimed that pavers had expanded and cracked because of the reaction between Medusa’s excessively alkaline cement and high concentrations of silica in County’s aggregate. Wausau alleged it had sustained damages in remedying property-damage and personal-injury claims and lost business and profits. Relying on the economic-loss doctrine, the trial court dismissed Wausau’s tort claims against Medusa. The Wisconsin Court of Appeals affirmed and certified the case to the Wisconsin Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Crooks, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership