Waverley Borough Council v. Fletcher

Q.B. 334 (1995), 4 All ER 756 (1995)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Waverley Borough Council v. Fletcher

England and Wales Court of Appeal
Q.B. 334 (1995), 4 All ER 756 (1995)

KL

Facts

Ian Fletcher (defendant) took a metal detector into a park in Surrey, England. The park was owned by the Waverley Borough Council (council) (plaintiff), and the public had free access to it. Fletcher found a medieval gold brooch several inches under the surface of the soil and reported it to a park ranger. After a coroner’s inquisition, the brooch was awarded to Fletcher. The council filed suit against Fletcher, seeking a declaration that the brooch belonged to the council. Fletcher argued that because he found the brooch while a lawful visitor to the park and the true owner had not been found, the brooch was his property under the principle of finders keepers (or finder’s rights). Fletcher also justified his right to dig and remove the brooch by arguing that the park’s bylaws permitted recreational activity, and metal detecting was a recreational activity. The court agreed, holding that the brooch belonged to Fletcher because a landowner does not own lost or abandoned objects and because Fletcher found the brooch while visiting the park lawfully. The council asked for an appeal.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Auld, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership