Logourl black

Weaver v. Palmer Bros. Co.

United States Supreme Court
270 U.S. 402 (1926)


Facts

The State of Pennsylvania passed the Act of 1923 to regulate the manufacture, sterilization, and sale of bedding. The statute specifically prevented the use of “shoddy,” or scraps of new and second-hand materials, in the manufacturing of new bedding. Palmer Bros. Co. (plaintiff) was a Connecticut-based manufacturer of bedding that was sold in Pennsylvania. The company uses shoddy in a variety of its products. Weaver (defendant), the Pennsylvania official responsible for enforcing the Act, threatened Palmer Bros. Co. with a fine or imprisonment for using shoddy. Palmer Bros. Co. brought suit in federal district court against Weaver to enjoin enforcement of the act on the grounds that the provisions violated Palmer Bros. Co.’s Due Process and Equal Protection rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. The district court granted the injunction, and Weaver appealed to the United States Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Butler, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Dissent (Holmes, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.