Weaver v. Palmer Bros. Co.
United States Supreme Court
270 U.S. 402 (1926)
- Written by Megan Petersen, JD
Facts
The State of Pennsylvania passed the Act of 1923 to regulate the manufacture, sterilization, and sale of bedding. The statute specifically prevented the use of “shoddy,” or scraps of new and second-hand materials, in the manufacturing of new bedding. Palmer Bros. Co. (plaintiff) was a Connecticut-based manufacturer of bedding that was sold in Pennsylvania. The company uses shoddy in a variety of its products. Weaver (defendant), the Pennsylvania official responsible for enforcing the Act, threatened Palmer Bros. Co. with a fine or imprisonment for using shoddy. Palmer Bros. Co. brought suit in federal district court against Weaver to enjoin enforcement of the act on the grounds that the provisions violated Palmer Bros. Co.’s Due Process and Equal Protection rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. The district court granted the injunction, and Weaver appealed to the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Butler, J.)
Dissent (Holmes, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.