Web-adviso v. Trump

927 F. Supp. 2d 32 (2013)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Web-adviso v. Trump

United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York
927 F. Supp. 2d 32 (2013)

  • Written by Meagan Messina, JD

Facts

Web-adviso (plaintiff) was a business that acquired over 200 high-value domain names and “parked” them with domain-parking service providers. At the time, Donald Trump (defendant) was known primarily as a real estate developer, hotelier, and reality-show host. Trump had registered his last name in capital letters as a trademark with the United States Patent and Trademark Office and used the mark continuously for at least five years. After Trump’s son announced plans to build Trump hotels and residences in Mumbai and Bangalore, India, Web-adviso purchased the domain names trumpindia.com and trumpmumbai.com. Trump’s attorney informed Web-adviso that Web-adviso’s use of the domain names violated Trump’s rights. After Web-adviso refused to transfer the domain names, Web-adviso sued, seeking a declaration that Web-adviso is entitled to use the domain names. Trump brought counterclaims against Web-adviso, alleging trademark infringement, unfair competition, trademark dilution, violation of the Lanham Act’s Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA), and unfair trade practices. Trump moved for partial summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 on Web-adviso’s claims and Trump’s counterclaims, arguing no genuine issue of material fact existed that Web-adviso has a protectable trademark, that Web-adviso’s use of the mark was likely to cause confusion, and that Web-adviso was a cybersquatter under the ACPA.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Irizarry, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership