North Dakota Supreme Court
589 N.W.2d 358 (1999)
Ruby Moos (plaintiff) and Herbert Weber (defendant) were married on September 13, 1995. Moos retained counsel 27 days later to start a divorce action. On October 12, 1995, Moos and Weber signed a property-settlement agreement drafted by Moos’s attorney. Weber declined advice to hire counsel and signed the agreement after reading it. The agreement gave Moos title to a condominium worth $70,000 owned by Weber prior to marriage. The same day the agreement was filed with the court, Weber hired an attorney and moved the court to set aside the agreement. The district court denied Weber’s motion, finding that Weber was able to protect his own interest and that there was no evidence of mistake, fraud, or undue duress. On appeal, the supreme court remanded, because the district court should have also considered whether the agreement was unconscionable. On remand, the district court found the agreement unconscionable and set it aside, because it was one-sided, created a hardship to Weber, and was unfair under the test that would be used by a court had there been no agreement. Moos appealed, arguing the agreement was not unconscionable.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Sandstrom, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 219,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.